However, this positive outlook is tempered by persistent urban demand weakness, contrasting sharply with rural market outperformance. The rural-urban contribution divide, consistent throughout the fiscal year, likely persisted in the fourth quarter. Rural markets, contributing 30-40% to the FMCG sector’s total sales, remained a crucial driver.
A concerning surge in key raw material costs–despite input costs remaining stable sequentially– is necessitating additional price hikes, following the September quarter’s increases. To what extent are ongoing price increases impacting consumer purchasing decisions? The market’s sustained demand, despite rising prices, indicates consumers have, thus far, absorbed the increased costs, at least for now.
The ongoing fiscal year will provide clearer insights into the sustainability of this price absorption. Analysts anticipate inflation to moderate further, potentially stimulating urban consumer demand in the coming quarters. Crisil Ratings expects the FMCG sector to see revenue rebound in the fiscal year 2026, compared to a modest expectation in the just-ended fiscal year on a gradual recovery in urban, and steady rural demand.
That said, rising input costs have likely created margin pressures in Q4. Analysts at Elara Capital and Nomura note that most companies will face impacts as their price increases have not kept pace with inflation. A Mint analysis of previous quarterly results shows that the FMCG sector has withstood margin pressures despite challenges, likely through cost control measures. After experiencing some margin pressure in the September quarter, companies saw improvements in the subsequent December quarter.
#Price #hikes #weak #urban #demand #FMCG #sector #eyes #input #cost #relief