The plea filed by LG Electronics in the Delhi HC, as seen by Mint, challenges the constitutional validity of amendments notified in September 2024 under the E-Waste Management Rules, 2022.
Also read | Zomato, CCI get Delhi high court notice on restaurant body’s plea in antitrust probe
These amendments mandate a minimum payout by producers to registered recyclers for extended producer responsibility (EPR) certificates: ₹22 per kg for general e-waste (such as TVs, washing machines, etc.) and ₹34 per kg for smartphone waste.
India, currently the world’s third-largest e-waste generator, only formally recycled 43% of its e-waste last year, according to government data.
In its plea, LG contends that the pricing rules “fail to take into consideration that merely fleecing companies and taxing them in the name of the ‘polluter pays principle’ will not achieve the government’s objectives.”
LG’s main concern is that the rules impose unreasonable financial obligations on companies without adequate justification. The mandatory payments to recyclers, particularly the increased costs of compliance, are seen as disproportionate and harmful to business profitability.
A major issue raised by LG is the arbitrary fixation of prices for EPR certificates. LG argues that these prices, significantly higher than previous years, lack a scientific basis and market analysis. The absence of clear guidelines for these prices creates ambiguity and makes it difficult for companies to comply.
Also read | From Hitachi, Havells, Voltas to Samsung — why electronic makers are unhappy with India’s e-waste recycling cost
Furthermore, LG has criticized the rules for linking financial burdens to environmental compensation (EC) for non-compliance with EPR obligations. This, they argue, could result in excessive penalties for minor delays, creating financial challenges and potentially crippling companies, especially small producers.
Another point of contention is the exclusion of the informal sector from the e-waste recycling framework. LG stresses that the informal sector handles a significant portion of recycling in India, and its exclusion undermines efforts to address the e-waste problem comprehensively. They advocate for a balanced approach that integrates both formal and informal recycling methods.
According to Markets and Data, India’s e-waste management market size was valued at $1.56 billion in fiscal year 2023 (FY23), which is expected to swell to $3.35 billion in FY31. India ranks as the world’s third-largest e-waste producer after the US and China. In 2022, India generated approximately 1.6 million tonnes of electronic waste, which is likely to surge to 29 million tonnes by 2030.
LG also raised concerns about the lack of consultation with industry stakeholders during the drafting of the amended rules. They argue that producers’ concerns were not sufficiently addressed, resulting in a regulatory framework that does not align with the practical realities of e-waste management.
Also read | Centre plans to start e-waste audit, impose penalty as environment compensation
Samsung Electronics and other companies, such as Indian air conditioner maker Blue Star, have also filed lawsuits challenging the rules, citing similar concerns over the compliance burdens.
India’s E-Waste Management rules were first introduced in 2016, making producers responsible for e-waste disposal. In 2022, the Union ministry of environment began revising these rules to address growing e-waste challenges.
A draft for public consultation was released in November 2022, followed by the final amendments in April 2023. The updated rules, enforced in September 2024, introduced new recycling targets, penalties, and the minimum payout to recyclers, which led to the legal challenges.
Delhi High Court, Central Pollution Control Board, LG Electronics, Samsung, electronic waste, e-waste, recyclers, E-Waste Management Rules 2022, EPR certificates, 4
#Delhi #orders #govt #response #Samsungs #ewaste #payout #challenge